2

Planning onto getting a 15" laptop and I have two choices, either 1920x1080 or 3840x2160 for the screen.

I have a 4K 32" inch display and the pixels are so ridiculously small that you need a magnifier to see them properly.

I used to have a 15" laptop with 1920x1080 and too, the pixels were ridiculously small.

On both of these environments, of course you have to scale DPI to 150% or more for eye comfort.

Some numbers, from https://www.sven.de/dpi/ :

4K/32": 27.89" × 15.69" = 437.55in² (70.84cm × 39.85cm = 2822.93cm²) at 137.68 PPI, 0.1845mm dot pitch, 18956 PPI²

4K/15": 13.07" × 7.35" = 96.14in² (33.21cm × 18.68cm = 620.27cm²) at 293.72 PPI, 0.0865mm dot pitch, 86272 PPI²

2K/15": 13.07" × 7.35" = 96.14in² (33.21cm × 18.68cm = 620.27cm²) at 146.86 PPI, 0.173mm dot pitch, 21568 PPI²

Question:

Why and when should one consider having 4K resolution on a 15" laptop?

Knowing that:

  • I won't do any kind of graphic design, mostly programming, I tend to always scale things up to 125%
  • 4 times more pixels to process, i.e. more power hungry, more heat, louder fan noise and pricier as well

2 Answers 2

2

Never do 4K on a laptop except if you have a special use case for it. It's indeed more power hungry and more expensive and the pixels are even smaller than the already small pixels of Full-HD

1

I believe 4k panel on a display that small is overkill.

I'm currently using 13 inch MacBook with 2560x1660 or 32 inch 4k display which look equally great; I believe that 2560x1660 on 15 inch display is a gold spot.

A 4k panel is probably not worth it due to

  • excessive power usage
  • probably high repair/replace cost due to rareness / complex technology
  • the fact that you hardly get any more details, unless you're looking at the screen through an electronic microscope

Note that even highest end apple MacBook has got 3456x2234 display, and that's a 16.2 inch one.

As for processing power, even my 5-years old entry-level MacBook (pre-apple-silicon) doesn't have any problem with running 4k display at 60fps (and it has around 4-5x less graphic processing power than current entry-level MacBook), so I really doubt it would be a problem if that's what concerns you.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.