4

I am looking for a small computer (preferably with Linux, but as long as it can be programmed I am happy), that comes in a casing and has at least one RS-232 (9 pin D-SUB) connector and an ethernet port.

Power consumption is not an issue, it will be grid-powered, size and price are important. Also, it is for a commercial application, so availability is also important.

I have found the NanosG20, but I was wondering if that is a good choice, or that others are perhaps available.

2 Answers 2

1

One solution with which I am familiar is to buy an older thin client such as the HP t5740e WES.

This machine is low-power and fairly cheap, but it has your RS-232 and ethernet as required. It also has some other neat perks, like 4gb of internal flash storage (not as fast as a conventional SSD for sustained reads/writes, but should make for a good swap partition or even OS partition, since it is low-power and has good seek times).

The biggest downside here is that it runs on the Atom N280 chip, which is a very low performance single core x86 processor with hyperthreading. A headless or openbox/i3/LXDE-based linux would be the best match for its capabilities, and don't ask it to do to much in the way of running a program. I've run old dosbox games on it just fine, but that's about the limit.

5
  • I'd personally would go with this one, Mainly because it's a bit more "self-contained". The Intel has a faster overall processor speed and front side bus (a bit more processing capability). I'm also a bit of a stickler for Intel CPUs.
    – 0-60FPS
    Sep 3, 2016 at 7:23
  • This is a decent choice, but it is for a commercial application, so it could get harder to find "older" thin clients reliably. Sep 4, 2016 at 13:25
  • @BartFriederichs please note that you need this for a commercial application in your question. My answer is perfect for your question as it stands, but not as you meant it to be.
    – Adam Wykes
    Sep 4, 2016 at 22:19
  • @AdamWykes I agree, I updated my question. Still, your solution isn't really small, which is what was in my original question. Sep 5, 2016 at 7:34
  • It's pretty small compared to most machines. Did you consider that asking for a "small" computer isn't really giving anyone the sense that you'd be a stickler on the size? If you need a certain dimension just say so.
    – Adam Wykes
    Sep 5, 2016 at 8:44
1

Another possible solution, if you need even less processing power and more cost savings, might be the ALIX.3D2. This is a dev board which supports linux and runs an AMD Geode x86 processor at 500mhz - very low power, very low performance, but also very small and rather inexpensive - though you'll have to source the enclosure and power supply as well, of course.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.